Shopping Guide and Reviews

Posts Tagged ‘Phone’

Ensquared the #1 authority for phone insurance on the Internet has announced that it will be launching the Ensquared phone insurance range of products through its Site and affiliated dealers in the next month. As the foremost recognized phone insurance Site in US and other countries, and having the advantage of the absolutely unique cell phone insurance calculator, Ensquared is perfectly positioned to offer consumers a relevant, value filled phone insurance program that is sure to shake up the insurance backed wireless protection industry.

 

The Ensquared experience in this arena has identified that anyone buying cell insurance directly from providers like AT&T, Verizon, Sprint etc is hampered by having to (a) buy the device from the provider without exception (b) likewise contract that device into their communication service and (c) buy the cell phone insurance offered on the day of activation or within maximum two weeks or one month of activation.

 

“This is extremely restricting,” says Gordon Polovin CEO of Ensquared. “In this day and age many customers are acquiring unlocked phones at retail price (not subsidized by providers) at discount sellers, and then electing to connect it to a contracted service or go prepaid. No way one can get provider insurance under those conditions.” Mr. Polovin went on to say that provider personnel are woefully short on phone insurance understanding and lack ability to sell this aligned cell phone product. Moreover, they get no commission even when they do. As a result there is no active or informed selling and more customers than not miss the critical time window for obtaining phone insurance through their chosen provider.

 

Ensquared also identified shortcomings of Internet competition like SquareTrade. The programs offered by this mainstream insurer is basically a capped warranty program that in fact does not relate to time but more on how quickly the capped warranty value gets eroded. “In our view” says Mr. Polovin “a SquareTrade warranty may be extinguished by one claim leaving the stated two year program empty of value and rendering the time aspect as useless in many cases.

 

Ensquared is bringing in a program that will address iPhones (all models) and every other brand. Not only will it offer very generous claim limits of around $1000 per claim, there are more than enough claims accessible in the term of 1 year or 2 years depending on product bought; Ensquared will insure any device bought from anyone and contracted out to different providers; and Ensquared iphone insurance and Ensquared phone insurance make mince meat of the most generous provider time window of 1 month. Essentially any standard device of 90 days or less or iPhones of 60 days or less will be insured. Most important, the Ensquared phone insurance includes accidental damage, lost or stolen,

 

“Our deductibles are going to be reasonable and very competitive; our claims servicing top class and our underwriters are extremely well rated,” says Polovin. “When we go live very soon Ensquared phone insurance will join the Ensquared Calculator – a comparison tool unrivalled to date – as a phone insurance household name.” Ensquared will be introducing a cutting edge program that is meaningful to all cell phone insurance buyers in the US.

If this helps I have a picture of my mother’s work car, it is not her’s, just the model and paint is same, but it has a button for a phone and we can’t figure it out, here is the picture:

http://media.photobucket.com/image/ford%20fusion%202010/costin_sim/2010-ford-fusion-hybrid-pozamare.jpg?o=18

We have tried where you hook up your iPod but it doesn’t fit and it’s not in the owners guide or on its website please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes this does have SYNC®
But when we tried to plug in her phone, it didn’t fit

Also her car has a phone button and when I press it, it says NO PHONE.
Yes this does have SYNC®
But when we tried to plug in her phone, it didn’t fit

Also her car has a phone button and when I press it, it says NO PHONE.
when I mean plug in phone I mean LINE IN (aux input jack)
Cross off everything in the beginning I read in the guide that if it says no phone then there is no sync, is there a way to work around or enable sync in car

Before buying one, you should know the different factors that you have to consider when purchasing a phone. Cellular phones have made one of the major evolvement that was then a science fiction.

Now, it makes you do a lot of options like taking snapshots, receiving and sending emails, playing games, recording videos, and listening to non-stop music of your choice.

Xaviera Arata Editor of the  Unlocked Cell Phones  website — http://www.UnlockedCellPhonesUsa.com — pointed out;

“…With all of these options, customers have a harder time choosing the phone that will answer their techie needs. It becomes more complicated when you wanted features that are separately featured…” Added Xaviera Arata

On the other hand, it would be easier on your part if you just focus on the main purpose of phones: sending messages and contacting people.

There are three things that you should do before buying a phone: understanding how mobile phones work, narrowing choices down to the best, and then making the final decision.

Understanding how mobile phones work

Some carriers are not compatible with some kinds of phones. Some phones allow you to transfer pictures from your personal computer to your phone and vice versa without being charged. Some phones make sending messages a breeze. While some phones features a more advanced video capture, others focus more on the quality and memory to fit their audio files. And it goes go on and on. That is how complicated phones are. You have to know what you want and understand that you have the power to make choosing easier. Look on the features that matter to you. Reading reviews can further help you in having an idea on what you want.

Narrowing choices down to the best

When you have decided on what you want, it’s time to narrow down your choices to other specifics. There are a lot of websites and customer service reports which states their phones features. In this way, your choices will be simplified. If you want a high quality camera phone, then inquire on your choice.

Making the Final Decision

Once you have your eyes set on a handset, it’s time to make the final decision and purchase it. Make sure that what you have chosen would be fit for you and you would have no regrets in the end. When your purchasing a cell phone you need further thinking so that regrets will not result.

“…You can also make certain comparisons in generalities and make sure that when you make that choice, it is the best…” Added Xaviera Arata

Further information, resources and unbiased reviews of the best unlocked cell phones by clicking: http://www.UnlockedCellPhonesUsa.com

Ok well tell me which one is a better deal. I am planning to get a new cellphone so tell me which one you think is a better deal. I have t-mobile so the phones i am talking about are from t-mobile. The Sidekick for $99 ( i will show links) or the Samsung Behold for $199. Which is a better deal for the money. Yeah the behold is expensive but it is it worth it? Please help I need answers fast. What is a better deal? Here is what i look for in phones : Camera, Email, Messaging, Games, Swivel or touch screen, and music. I don’t care for 3G. Also i am a young person. (pre teen) so i am not a business person or anything. Please help!!!

Samsung Behold: http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/phones/Cell-Phone-Detail.aspx?cell-phone=Samsung-Behold-Espresso

Sidekick: http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/phones/Cell-Phone-Detail.aspx?cell-phone=T-Mobile-Sidekick

Here they are in comparison (look at this link!!!): http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/phones/Compare.aspx?devices=0bc43a5f-3dc0-4569-9882-0639a76d2865,c72a6f5a-72b6-47c0-81b7-691e66861642&manufacturer=

Help and answer. Tell me what you think and if you think you know another phone from t-mobile might be even better for me I also like slider phones! Thanks again.

I am 12 (13 in less than 3 months) and my parents who always say maybe next year when I bring up this question told me yesterday I will get one when I am 16! But see here’s what’s crazy about it. At this age a lot of kids have one. I am a responsible girl who gets great grades. My brother was 15 when he got his first cell phone and he broke it within a year after he got it. My brother is definitely not as responsible as me because his cell phone got broke in his basbeall bag by his bat! I don’t really want or need a cell phone but I feel kind of left out. I want your true opinion! For me I don’t think I might ever get a cellphone but it’s not like a cell phone is my first choice (a puppy is but my parents say no to that 2). And just so you know my brother gets a lot more attention then I do. He got a laptop broke it. An expensive phone broke it. Got a more expensive phone!
By the way my parents paid and are paying for all of these items.
He paid for 2 ipods broke the first and got a new one. (still has)

I had 2 cameras (more expensive than teh ipod) the first one had something iternally wrong with it (i didn’t break it) and the second I have. Both I paid for (over 100 dollars).

I got an ipod (I paid for).

And a desktop computer (well actually it isn’t mine and I didn’t pay for it was meant as a gift for me but even after my brother promised to let me use his cell phone he uses my computer more than me! and the only reason my parents bought it is because my dad needed an email for my brother’s baseball career and my brothers school work). I have you know I have went to over a thousand baseball games in my lifetime and never ever a thanks! I am so irritated with my family because they never buy me anything for Christmas this year I got two shirts! My brother got lots of cash. Is it me or am I being ignored! I know I went on and on about this but just a comparison of our electronics you can tell who has had the most money spent on (my dad has spent more than 200 thousand dollars actually way more than that to my ungrateful brother for baseball teams and traveling with him).

“Wherever you go, there we are.” – Cellular One slogan

ANTIPHONY: A style of chanting involving a call and response. Since billions of people are called to cell and portable phones every day – and most will be chosen to conduct the biggest biological experiment ever undertaken on this planet – perhaps some responses to this mass culture of addiction and denial are in order.

Did someone say “addiction”?

“In January 2001 alone, over 900 million text messages were sent in the UK.”
[BBC May 24/01]

“This text messaging train just keeps on running on its tracks. We reached $80 billion worth of revenues out of mobile phone simple SMS text messaging last year… Now it’s clear this year we will pass the 100 billion dollar mark… Oh, in absolute numbers, we’ll hit about 2.8 trillion. What is that per day? 8 BILLION texts sent every day. Or 92,000 text messages sent every second of every day.” -consultant Tomi T Ahonen [communities-dominate.blogs.com Sept 21/07]

“Cell phone dependency is now called compulsive communicating. Chain dialers call continually to get another ‘fix’. [Spokesman Review Nov 12/05]

“Mobile phones are replacing nicotine as the foremost addictive obsession in Great Britain.” [British Medical Journal Apr/06]

“75% of British teenagers said they literally could not bear to be without their phone.” [London Telegraph Dec19/04]

“A London detox clinic specializes in helping patients deal with behavioral addiction related to cell phone use.” [Courier-Mail Oct 7/03]

“2006 was the turning point when the industry started focusing not just on teenagers and adults but also on tweens – children between middle childhood and adolescence, usually 8 to 12 years old – and even children as young as 5.” [New York Times Mar 8/08] 

“A Eurobarometer survey of almost 1,000 children in 29 countries found most had telephones after age 9.” [New York Times Mar 8/08] 

“Grotesque.” -Dr. George Carlo’s comment on marketing strategies aimed at children during a New Zealand prime time TV news show. [IsraCast Technology News July 29/05]

It’s “open season on kids.” -investigative reporter Amy Worthington 

“Nine out of 10 children under the age of 16 have a mobile phone.” [Guardian June 29/01] 

“Children may be more vulnerable because of their developing nervous system, the greater absorption of energy in the tissues of the head and a longer lifetime of exposure.” -renowned British biochemist and president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science Sir William Stewart after completing a UK government report on “Mobile Phones and Health” in April 2000. 

“My daughter has had her phone for 2 years, she is now 12 and so far everything is great. “ -mommyneedssleep [online blogger Dec 23/08]

“Parents should take their children away from that technology.” -Wolfram Koenig head of federal authority for radiation protection in Germany. [Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine Sept /01]

“Children who talk on a cell phone may not be able to cross the road safely… The seemingly simple act of crossing the street actually involves complex brain processes. And ‘unintentional pedestrian injury’ is a leading cause of death in middle childhood.” [Health News medicinenet.com Apr 11/08] 

“Childhood leukemia is the most frequent childhood malignancy… This peak seems to have been newly evolved in the early quarter of the 20th century and may be due to electrification. [Bioeffects Initiative report]

“I believe that 30% of all childhood cancers are associated with EMF exposure.” -Dr. David Carpenter, Dean at the School of Public Health, State University of New York.
[Sunday Mirror Apr/04] 

“We’re pretty bullish on increased usage by teenagers.” -Adam Guy, Strategist Group senior analyst. [London Telegraph Oct 9/07]

“A whole generation of teenagers face premature senility in the prime of their lives due to the use of mobile phones and new wireless technology.” [RFSafe.com Nov26/03]

“If you put a 20-year-old driver behind the wheel with a cell phone, his reaction times are the same as a 70-year-old driver.” – David Strayer, University of Utah psychology professor and principal author of the Transport Research study. 

“It’s like instant aging.” -UK chief medical officer 

“Because hands-free phones use up to 10-times more power to operate, they are even more dangerous than holding a phone to your skull while driving. Medical studies show that hands-free devices actually raise the amount of radiation being directed into the head by three times.” [Inter@ctive Week Apr13/00 ] 

“Here’s the key point. These radio waves are a form of electromagnetic radiation, much like the energy that heats your microwave oven or is used for radar. Sounds worrisome, but the good news is (this does) not damage DNA and is not felt to harm living tissues at the levels of heat induced by a cell phone.” [blogs.webmd.com] 

“The conclusion that if health effects of commonly encountered RF exposures exist, they must be small is wrong. The evidence points to a quite substantial hazard.” [Bioeffects Initiative report]

“I find it quite strange to see so many official presentations saying that there is no risk.” -Professor Mild, co-Swedish researcher after carrying out some of the most extensive original work into tumours among long-term mobile phone and portable phone users.

“It has been established beyond reasonable doubt that some adverse health effects occur at far lower levels of exposure … some at several thousand times below the existing safety limits.” [Independent Oct 7/07]

“University of Washington researchers funded by the U.S. military demonstrated that 2.4 gigahertz radiation increases the frequency of single-strand DNA breaks in the brain cells of live rats after only two hours of exposure at only 1/5th of the FCC’s so-called ‘safety’ limits.” [rfsafe.com Nov 2/05]

“The available scientific evidence does not show any health problems are associated with using wireless phones.” -U.S. Food and Drug Administration [blogs.webmd.com]

“Physical testing to verify compliance is relatively rare.” -FCC [Radio Frequency Safety] 

Funded by Vodafone, the Mobile Operators Association and other cell phone manufacturers, the study results failed to mention that 12 of 56 – or more than one-in-five – volunteers became too ill from the microwave exposure and had to drop out of the tests. [mastsanity.org]

“FCC officials are bribed by the industry with such perks as expensive trips to Las Vegas.” [capitolhillblue.com May 22/03]

“There is no research being done in the United States at the present time, even though we started this field back in the early 1970s. All of that research has been stopped because of industry.” -Dr. Om Gandhi [Uncensored (NZ) Nov 9/06]

“These days in the committee (that sets the standards), one co-chair is from Motorola (C.K. Chou) and the other is from the Navy, the military-industrial establishment (Dr. John D’Andrea), and they are suddenly loosening their standards.” -Dr. Gandhi [Uncensored (NZ) Nov 9/06]

“There are more than 15,000 scientific studies reporting the cell phone health hazards. At least 66 epidemiological studies show that electromagnetic radiation increases brain tumors in human populations.” [Cell Phone Convenience or 21st Century Plague? by Dr. Nick Begich and James Roderick earthpulse.com]

“Studies show there has been a 40% across-the-board increase in the number of brain tumors in the past 20 years.” -Australia’s Senator Lyn Allison, after brain tumors became the leading cause of death in children under 15. [ Observer Mar14/99]

“11,000 Scandinavian cell phone users were studied and they showed significant neurological effects in a dose response manner… There is also a higher incidence of cardiac problems… The neurological effects are noticed within minutes of using a cell phone.” -Neil Cherry biophysicist at Lincoln University in Christ Church, New Zealand 

“Perhaps putting a mobile phone repeatedly to your head is something that might not be good in the long term.” -Professor Leif Salford, longtime cell phone researcher into impacts on brain through the blood-brain barrier [BBC Feb 5/03] 

More than 26 million people worldwide are stricken by Alzheimer’s disease, and a new forecast says the number will quadruple by 2050. At that rate, at least one in 85 people onboard planet Earth will be brain-wiped within 40 years. [AP June 10/07]

One of the first indications of dementia – and a common side effect of frequent ‘cordless’ cell and portable phone use – is memory loss. French researchers have found that the abnormal proteins found in Alzheimer’s cases always deposit in the hippocampus first. Cell phone radiation is directly implicated in forming these abnormal proteins. [ Proceedings of the Second Kuopio Alzheimer Symposium, Finland, Jan/01;] 

British researchers confirm that cell phone radiation changes the shape of brain proteins, causing them to clump together and reach out with pathological fibrils like those found in patients afflicted with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. [Microwave News May/June 2003]

“Irradiated neurons in the brain die rapidly because these nerve cells have a low capacity for DNA repair.” [Paper presented by Dr. Henry Lai at the Mobile Phones and Health Symposium, in Vienna, Austria Oct 25-28/98] 

WHERE WE ARE
“At this point in time, there’s just over three billion users of cell phones worldwide. So that’s half of our world population, or almost half.” -Dr. Vini Khurana, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery, Canberra Hospital to television host Larry King. [Larry King Live May 27/08] 

“Today it is estimated that more than 90% percent of the Western world uses cell phones.” -PhD Andrew Michrowski, Planetary Association for Clean Energy [Whole Life Expo 2007 Toronto Nov 25/07] 

“Young people today are becoming stupid.” -Toshiyuki Sawaguchi, Japanese professor of neurobiology, blaming cell phone use for early senility. [rense.com Feb 5/01] 

“A literacy study conducted in 2005 on 19,000 young Americans is sobering. Only one in three American college grads can read a complex book and extrapolate from it… an overwhelming majority of college students are unable to understand arguments in a newspaper editorial or to comprehend a simple comparison table.” 
[Washington Post Dec 25/05]

“For three years now Ingri and I have been traveling with a hand-held device called a ‘zapchecker’. The zapchecker measures ambient levels of electromagnetic radiation. During dozens of road trips throughout the western U.S. since 2003, we would be driving along and notice that the zapchecker would suddenly ‘spike’. We would then see a cell tower, a hospital or government building with a satellite communications array, a radio station or sometimes, high tension lines within a half mile or so. After a few minutes, the zapchecker would calm down again until the next wireless monument came within range… 

“On March 30, 2006, Ingri and I traveled from Spirit Lake to Seattle to attend what turned out to be an excellent 9/11 truth event on the University of Washington campus. What we experienced with regard to measurable amounts of ambient electromagnetic radiation was shocking to us and occupied much of our conversation throughout our journey. Wherein previous years there would be miles between measurable amounts of radiation being detected by our zapchecker, the opposite was suddenly true. Our zapchecker was spiking about 90% of the time during our 800-mile round trip. It was ‘clean’ only between cell towers and now there is almost always one in sight. In all cases, when we were in urban areas, the zapchecker was solidly spiked – even when the sensitivity of the device was turned down.” -Amy Worthington 

One in six children suffers some neurological disability, and the rate of autism has skyrocketed in the last decade. “In the USA, one in every 166 children has an autism spectrum disorder- an increase of 6,000% since the 1970′s,” reports the Boston Globe. [Boston Globe July 1/05]

RF exposure “is wholly correlated with the repeatedly documented increased incidence of autism: now reported by at least some researchers as greater than 1 per 100 newborn. ” -Dr. Kane [elektrosmognews.de Feb/02]

Melatonin has been shown to help prevent Alzheimer’s. Melatonin also blocks estrogen’s propensity to develop breast tumors in women. Eleven published epidemiologic studies in residences and workplaces show Microwaves emitted by cell phones and portables, wireless routers and cell phone towers sharply reduce melatonin production. [Bioeffects Initiative] 

SOLUTIONS
“There is a need for a biological standard to replace the thermal standard and to also protect against cumulative effects across the EM spectrum.” [Bioeffects Initiative report]

“Worldwide harmonization of standards have to be based on biological responses.” [Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop - "Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Biological Effects of EMF" March 2005] 

“Thirteen years of continuous radiation exposure in public school cancer zones is child abuse. Networking systems using cables are the answer.” -Amy Worthington 

Renowned brain surgeon, “Dr. Vini Khurana urges everyone to stop using cell phones immediately.” [Independent Mar 30/08] 

The China cell phone brand CECT started to spread on the international market with good quality, rich features and great pricing. Among all CECT wholesale mobile phones, CECT P168 and CECT i9 are the bestsellers. In reality, CECT i9 is the latest updated version of P168, the first iPhone clone which gains its popularity with user-friendly interface and unsurpassable pricing advantage. Of course, i9 is better than CECT P168. The following will give a basic introduction to these two CECT cell phones.

CECT P168: In terms of usability, if you are seeking a real iPhonoe, CECT P168 will not satisfy you, but if you are just seeking a rich-feature, convenient but cheap cellular phone, CECT P168 will more than enough. The CECT P168 looks really similar to iPhone, except that the menu buttons of the two cell phones are obviously different. Even the wallpaper of P168 is similar to that of iPhone. The P168 features a 3.5-inch touch scree” a 2 MP camera (actual resolution is 1.3 Megapixel). Besides, it has dual-SIM card slot, video player, music player, software downloading capacity, games and tools like alarm clock, calculator, dictionary, etc. However, CECT P168 does not have the function of simultaneous use of two SIM cards. Users have to change between the two SIMs they are using. P168 can be set with caller photos and personal favourite ringtones. Also, the touch-screen keypad makes CECT P168 a model easier to write messages and dial numbers. New users should be aware that the ringtones and the message alert sounds are very loud. When I heard the ringtone of CECT P168 for the first time, I was shocked by the too loud ringtones! Even if you set the sound to the lowest, it sounds louder than other cellular phones.

CECT i9: As the closest iPhone imitator ever, the CECT i9 is quite interesting. It is hot-selling for various reasons. In comparison with CECT P168, i9 has a sleeker look as well as more useful features. A range of functions have been upgraded CECT i9 since the emergence of CECT P168. Before the emergence of CECT i9, models based on CECT P168 included CECT P168 Plus and CECT Sciphone. The new CECT i9 supports the simultaneous use of 2 cards, thus avoiding the trouble to switch between 2 SIMs. Shake and tilt feature is available in this model. The shake feature makes it possible to advance or forward music, media and songs by shaking the model and the tilt feature means whether you put the CECT i9 in portrait or landscape, the handset will adjust itself to be up right automatically . In addition, the expandable memory storage is enlarged to up to 8GB. Finally, the most important upgrade with the CECT i9 lies in the Java support, which supports third party applications such as outlook express, cool games—many can be got for free. Though the pricing of the CECT i9 is a little higher than that of the CECT P168, with so many upgraded features, you will find the CECT i9 is totally worthy! If you think the upgraded features are not necessary for you, just go for the cheaper CECT P168—it is also a great cellular

With so many Reverse Phone Lookup Services advertised all over the Internet, how does one know which one is the best? When it comes time to actually pick a service to use, you might ask yourself whether or not all reverse phone search services offer the same services. The answer is, NO.

After reviewing dozens of products and services advertised on the Internet, it is easy to identify which websites offer valuable information and which ones don’t. For the most part, the information you are looking for is public records. That means, with enough surfing the web, you will probably find the information you are looking for; however, you have to ask yourself, do I have several hours to do my research? If the answer is No, a Reverse Phone Search product is probably for you.

Before you decide on a specific product, make sure you have a clear understanding for what information you want to obtain. The so-called free search sites out there will provide limited amounts of information, such as only a name and address. The pay sites will provide much more. Some provide satellite photos of the location, the provider name, the dates of contract, where the contract was entered and even email addresses for the owner. That being said, the sites that charge for a membership usually are the better way to go as they will generally give you more bang for your buck.

Something else you want to look at is how long the site has been operating. With all the fly by night companies out there, if you want quality information, stick to the sites with a good reputation ( find them at www.FreeInvestigationReports.com ). This does not mean the newer sites are not as good; some might be significantly better. It is simply another comparison to review when determining which site to use.

In conclusion, the sites that require a paid membership generally contain much more information in the reports they provide. If you have several hours and know where to look, you might be able to get by without the need for a reverse phone lookup site; however, if you value your time and need results fast, this is the product for you.

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/estimating-cellphone-effect-22-points.html

Six of the seven cellphone-friendly pollsters have had a Democratic (Obama) lean, and in several cases it has been substantial. On average, they had a house effect of Obama +2.8. By comparison, the control group had essentially zero house effect a house effect of Obama +0.1, so this would imply that including a cellphone sample improves Obama’s numbers by 2.8 points. (Or, framed more properly, failing to include cellphones hurts Obama’s numbers by approximately 2-3 points).

Ouch?

Choosing a new mobile phone is a process based heavily upon personal preference. Your decision will hinge on a combination of factors such as price, functions, handset design, inclusive minutes and brand desirability. If for instance you were particularly looking for a handset which could serve as a portable entertainment device, you would be more likely to opt for a model which featured impressive mp3 and video handling and storage, than a phone designed specifically with business applications in mind.

Due to the ever growing number of points of sale for mobile phones and increased competition to close the deal, the market has however changed over recent years, and done so in a manner which can be of serious benefit to the savvy consumer. Not only does the customer now have the choice of which handset and tariff they would like, but also, by consulting mobile phone comparison sites: the opportunity to choose which free gift options or cash incentives they find most appealing.

In the current market it is possible to secure anything from a free Bluetooth handset through to an IPod or even a cutting edge games console when taking out a particular mobile phone contract. Although it can seem too good to be true that a company would be willing to give you an expensive piece of kit along with your new phone, it is worth remembering just how much a contract mobile phone actually costs over the course of the contract period. In many cases a contract mobile phone may work out more than